|
The time has come to end struggle sessions and professional ruin for people whose remarks are overheard, half-heard, or misunderstood. This should especially apply when comments that sound offensive are actually part of a discussion condemning the very prejudice they appear to express. Such is the case with Hunter College biology professor Dr. Allyson Friedman, whose career now hangs in the balance because of what listeners think they heard her say during a Zoom meeting. At a Community Education Council meeting on Manhattan’s West Side, participants were discussing Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s proposal to close or relocate several schools. A Black student spoke passionately in defense of her school. Then came an overheard comment. “They’re too dumb to know they’re in a bad school,” Dr. Friedman was heard saying on a hot Zoom mic. “If you train a Black person well enough, they’ll know to use the back. You don’t have to tell them anymore.” Taken at face value, the remark sounded shocking. Many attendees were understandably offended. But that is not the full story. Moments earlier, Reginald Higgins, the district’s interim acting superintendent, had quoted historian Carter G. Woodson, the son of formerly enslaved parents and the second Black scholar to earn a Ph.D. from Harvard. Woodson wrote in his classic work The Mis-Education of the Negro: “When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his ‘proper place’ and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.” Woodson’s point was not racist. It was an indictment of racism and the power of internalized oppression. Dr. Friedman says she was speaking privately to her daughter during the meeting, paraphrasing Woodson’s point in conversational language while explaining the quote Higgins had referenced. Part of that explanation was not captured by the hot mic, stripping away the context that made clear she was criticizing racism, not endorsing it. Context, however, rarely survives a viral moment. New York politicians quickly seized on the clip. Social media erupted with demands that she be fired. Hunter College, part of the City University of New York, launched a review and issued a statement: “We expect our community members’ actions and words to comport with our institutional identity, values, and policies. We stand firm in our enduring commitment to sustain an inclusive educational environment.” That principle is sound. But it makes little sense to apply it against an academic who, by all accounts, has a strong professional record and who appears to have been discussing the history of racism rather than expressing it. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) captured the stakes succinctly: “Should someone’s livelihood be up to the whims of lawmakers and social media mobs? A mother is facing unemployment for discussing systemic racism with her child – what kind of message does that send to the working parents of NYC?” Nevertheless, Dr. Friedman has been placed on leave. If universities begin firing professors for what people think they heard in an overheard fragment of a conversation, then reason, fairness, and academic freedom will all become collateral damage. Comments are closed.
|
Archives
April 2026
Categories
All
|
ABOUT |
ISSUES |
TAKE ACTION |
RSS Feed