Protect The 1st Foundation
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
Picture

Equal Campus Access Act Advances in the House

8/6/2026

 
Picture
​Religious organizations seeking official recognition on college campuses – and the same access to facilities as secular groups – are sometimes denied recognition. The reason?

Administrators have told student religious groups that they must open their leadership to people of all beliefs or no beliefs – otherwise, they would be guilty of discrimination. One such group at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, Ratio Christi, was told in 2019 that they had to leave their leadership positions open to all, regardless of their beliefs.

“It would be absurd for the university to require the vegan student group to appoint a meat-lover as its president,” observes Travis Barham, senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom. “Likewise, the University of Colorado shouldn’t force Christian students to let atheists or other non-Christians to lead their Bible studies in order to become a registered club.”

Some universities, like Tufts, have reversed their positions. Ratio Christi reached a settlement with the University of Colorado after filing a lawsuit. But many universities continue to bar religious groups from becoming recognized student organizations. This might soon change thanks to the passage of a bill by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

The committee recently approved the Equal Campus Access Act, legislation that would require public colleges and universities to afford religious student organizations the same rights, benefits, and privileges they provide to other campus groups. Institutions that discriminate against religious organizations could lose access to federal funding.

The bill, introduced by Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI), would protect religious organizations’ access to official recognition, campus facilities, and other benefits available to student groups. Crucially, these protections would apply regardless of an organization’s religious beliefs, practices, speech, leadership requirements, or standards of conduct.

“That protection is necessary because freedom of association means more than permitting students to gather in the same room,” said Bob Goodlatte, former House Judiciary Committee Chairman and Protect the First Senior Policy Advisor. “It includes the ability of an organization to preserve its identity and pursue its mission by selecting leaders who share its fundamental beliefs.”

A university would never insist that College Democrats select a Republican as their president or require an environmental organization to accept a climate-change skeptic as its spokesperson. Religious organizations deserve the same freedom to choose leaders who can faithfully represent their principles.

Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), who introduced the Senate version with Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), framed the issue in appropriately constitutional terms:

“Freedom of religion, speech, and association are Constitutionally protected rights in every place in America, including America’s campuses. This bill makes clear that public colleges must grant religious student organizations the same rights as every other student group.”

The bill would codify a 2020 federal rule requiring the withdrawal of federal support from public colleges and universities that deny religious student organizations the rights available to comparable secular groups. It is backed by 47 organizations representing Christians, Jews, Muslims, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as well as First Amendment organizations.

Public universities should encourage a vigorous diversity of beliefs, not force religious students to surrender the defining characteristics of their organizations as the price of participating in campus life.
​
The committee has acted. The full House and Senate should follow.

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    October 2026
    September 2026
    August 2026
    July 2026
    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    2025 Year In Review
    Academic Freedom
    Amicus Briefs
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence
    Book Banning
    Campus Speech
    Censorship
    Congress
    Court Hearings
    Donor Privacy
    Due Process
    Executive Power
    First Amendment
    First Amendment Online
    Freedom Of Expression
    Freedom Of Press
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Government Ownership
    Government Transparency
    In The Media
    Journalism
    Law Enforcement
    Legal
    Legislation
    Legislative Agenda
    Letters To Congress
    Motions
    News
    Online Speech
    Opinion
    Parental Rights
    PRESS Act
    PT1 Amicus Briefs
    Save Oak Flat
    School Choice
    SCOTUS
    Section 230
    Speaking Of The First Amendment
    Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

we  the  people.

LET  YOUR  VOICE  BE  HEARD:


ABOUT

Who We Are

​Leadership

ISSUES

1st Amendment

TAKE ACTION

Donate

​Contact Us
® Copyright 2026 Protect The 1st Foundation