ICE’s Social Media Content Surveillance Threatens Free Speech

Civil libertarians, journalists, and commentators are increasingly alarmed at the lengths to which ICE – the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency – appears willing to go in response to peaceful protests.

ICE has now launched a pressure campaign to force Big Tech to help identify persons who post content deemed “critical” of the agency. ICE is filing hundreds – perhaps thousands – of subpoenas intended to compel tech companies to hand over the identities of Americans behind social media posts. This approach is unprecedented, transforming an exceptional legal maneuver – an emergency procedure designed for crises like child endangerment – into a potential end-run around core First Amendment protections.

Americans retain a constitutional right to anonymous speech, a principle woven deeply into American political tradition. The government does not get to strip American speakers of their anonymity simply because their speech is deemed too harsh or inconvenient.

Under these legal principles, the First Amendment remains an expansive safeguard for Americans who assemble peaceably to protest – whether on the street or online. Being loud, abrasive, or deeply critical of government power does not strip any citizen of constitutional protection. It certainly doesn’t make them “domestic terrorists” worthy of official surveillance.

“The question is not, ‘Is it annoying or frustrating to the officer?’ The question is, ‘Is that annoyance or frustration constitutionally protected?’” law professor Seth Stoughton told NPR.

“Criticism of government actions is at the very core of what the First Amendment protects.”
Now all these laws, precedents, and norms that protect protest are under heightened pressure because ICE wants names.

If ICE succeeds in expanding surveillance of lawful political expression, the FBI, IRS, FTC, SEC, and other agencies will soon seek similar authority. And they will not limit their scrutiny to critics of ICE. They will search for “extremists” of every ideological stripe – pro-choice and pro-life, socialist and MAGA alike – depending on the political winds of the moment.
​
You may support anti-ICE protesters, or you may believe ICE’s mission is essential. That disagreement is precisely the point. Whatever you believe about the Trump administration’s immigration policy, what ICE is attempting to do with social media threatens all Americans. The power claimed today against one set of speakers can just as easily be used tomorrow against you.

DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS