|
The Little Sisters of the Poor is a Catholic charity operated by nuns who care for the elderly poor. For 14 years now, they’ve had to undergo the legal version of the Stations of the Cross, dragged from courtroom to courtroom for refusing to violate their religious conscience. The latest attack on their mission by the states of Pennsylvania and New Jersey is utterly gratuitous – and flies in the face of two clear victories by the Little Sisters before the U.S. Supreme Court upholding their right to the free expression of religion. Now these states are tripling down with a fresh attack to force the Little Sisters to violate their religious conscience. “At bottom, the case asks whether religious claimants can decide for themselves that complying with a government program to avoid ruinous fines would violate their religious beliefs, thereby imposing a substantial burden under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA),” Protect The 1st told the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. The ordeal of the Little Sisters began when the federal Department of Health and Human Services issued a mandate under the Affordable Care Act requiring employers to provide contraceptives – including some that can cause abortions – in their insurance programs. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of the Little Sisters to receive a religious exemption from this mandate. Not content to leave them alone, the states sued to force the Little Sisters to force these nuns to provide contraceptives and abortifacients, or face tens of millions of dollars in fines. Once again, in a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court shielded the Little Sisters of the Poor. Now the Javerts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey are back with a new theory. They want this charity to be subject to a provision in federal guidelines to “self-certify” so that the government can provide payments to beneficiaries for contraceptive services separate from their health plan. The federal government, however, issued a rule designating the self-certification procedure as optional, while allowing religious employers with complicity-based objections to opt out of this requirement. This did not stop a federal court from finding in favor of the states. These states insist on making the Little Sisters complicit in providing contraceptives. They are doing so by insisting on the enforcement of a federal provision that the federal government itself only enforces as “optional.” The majority of Americans – including many Roman Catholics – have no issue of conscience with contraceptives. But the belief of the Little Sisters of the Poor is in keeping with Catholic doctrine and is a closely held tenet of their faith. In our amicus brief, we tell the Third Circuit: “The lower court’s rejection of the Little Sisters’ religious belief is particularly troubling … compliance with the government program at issue here would make them complicit in an activity their religion forbids.” We see this as potentially harming religious minorities with religious views and practices outside of the mainstream. “Those minorities face unique challenges to the right to practice their religions. Those challenges run the gamut from overt hostility from the prevailing religious majority to claims that minority beliefs are just ‘strange, even silly.’ If courts can reject claims that religious beliefs are violated by a particular government action, then that protection is lost.” Comments are closed.
|
Archives
January 2026
Categories
All
|
ABOUT |
ISSUES |
TAKE ACTION |
RSS Feed