Protect The 1st Foundation
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
Picture

The Problem with Selective Prosecution – Your Day Will Come

11/4/2025

 
Picture
New York, NY - May 26, 2022: Attorney General Letitia James speaks during joint announcement with mayor Eric Adams at AG New York office.
​New York Attorney General Letitia James appears to have been hoisted by her own petard… Wait a minute, what’s a petard?

The phrase comes from William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. A petard was a compressed pot of gunpowder, a kind of Reformation-era grenade. In modern English, this phrase means being blown up with your own weapon.

For President Trump’s most ardent defenders, James’ predicament – being charged by the Department of Justice for bank fraud and making false statements – is more than deeply ironic. For them, it is like a fine liquor to roll across one’s tongue and savor.

Consider: James ran for her office by making an explicit promise to get Donald Trump for… something.

Once elected, she brought a civil action against then-private citizen Donald Trump and the Trump Organization for exaggerating his wealth while seeking a commercial loan. The former and future president was fined $515 million, even though his lender – a former Deutsche bank executive – testified that Trump was a model borrower. An appeals court later slashed the amount of the fine.

“Today, justice has been served,” James said in reaction to her courtroom win. “This is a tremendous victory for this state, this nation, and for everyone who believes that we must all play by the same rules – even former presidents.”

Now James is facing federal charges for making false statements regarding her renting of a second home in Virginia. If convicted, James could face a fine of up to $1 million, and a possible (though unlikely) 30 years in prison.

James’ own words are being thrown in her face – “we must all play by the same rules.”

The satisfying taste of irony may turn bitter for James’ critics. Politico reports that the indictment omitted the fact that James’ Second Home Rider explicity mentioned “short-term rentals.”

This story follows on the heels of the president’s attempted firing of Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook “for cause” – now stayed by the courts – for allegedly claiming two properties as her primary residences. If she lied, she could have obtained better mortgage terms – not a good look for someone who regulates national interest rates.

As with the James case, however, the facts are murky. It is reported that Cook characterized one property as a “vacation home” in a loan estimate.

The administration’s mortgage police at the Federal Housing Finance Agency referred another bête noire, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), to the Department of Justice on a mortgage issue.

What to make of all this?

The original sin in this train of abuses was Attorney General James’ pursuit of civil charges against a former president and political enemy whom she had promised voters to ruin in court. This was compounded by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of Donald Trump for his hush-money payoff to porn star Stormy Daniels – spun by Bragg into 34 felony counts, including, somehow, violations of election law.

Now, on the theory that turnabout is fair play, the administration is targeting its former tormentors. Some of the cases – against former FBI Director James Comey and former National Security Advisor John Bolton – are complicated. For example, Comey was at best disingenuous in how he used the FBI to plant stories about Russian collusion from a source that he knew was dodgy. In both cases, however, these men have clearly been targeted out of animus. The scrupulous attention given to Bolton’s treatment of classified material, which prompted an FBI raid on his home, is clearly payback for writing a tell-all about the former advisor’s work in the first Trump White House.

Worse, the James-Cook-Schiff mortgage cases are not the result of a general crackdown. It appears that political appointees are selectively pulling mortgages of enemies for close examination.

On a human level, the instinct for payback is understandable. But if Republicans and Democrats keep targeting each other for prosecution, the U.S. political arena will come to resemble that of Moscow, where prosecutors are always ready to follow up on the promise of Stalin’s police chief, Lavrentiy Beria, who famously said: “Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.”

If selective prosecution is institutionalized, expect this weapon to be turned around once again against the people who now wield it.
​
Petards are being thrown, right and left. Keep it up, and everyone will be hoisted.

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Amicus Briefs
    Analysis
    Book Banning
    Campus Speech
    Censorship
    Congress
    Court Hearings
    Donor Privacy
    Due Process
    First Amendment
    First Amendment Online
    Freedom Of Press
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Government Transparency
    In The Media
    Journalism
    Law Enforcement
    Legal
    Legislation
    Legislative Agenda
    Letters To Congress
    Motions
    News
    Online Speech
    Opinion
    Parental Rights
    PRESS Act
    PT1 Amicus Briefs
    Save Oak Flat
    School Choice
    SCOTUS
    Section 230
    Speaking Of The First Amendment
    Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

we  the  people.

LET  YOUR  VOICE  BE  HEARD:


ABOUT

Who We Are

​Leadership

ISSUES

1st Amendment

TAKE ACTION

Donate

​Contact Us
® Copyright 2024 Protect The 1st Foundation