Protect The 1st Foundation
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Issues
  • Scorecards
  • News
  • Take Action
    • Educational Choice for Children Act
    • PRESS Act
    • Save Oak Flat Act
  • DONATE
Picture

Why Did a Federal Appeals Court Spike Florida’s “Stop WOKE Act”?

7/14/2026

 
Picture
​When it comes to freedom of expression, the law cannot discriminate against viewpoints. The First Amendment is neutral, making it a guardrail against today’s speech police on the right and the left. As much as some might wish otherwise, the First Amendment contains no exception for regulations protecting dignity, flags, or anyone’s idea of speech that is reasonable or unreasonable.

Nor does the Constitution say anything about course catalogs at universities, as a Trump-appointed judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reminded Florida last week. The state’s 2022 Stop WOKE Act restricted how public higher education institutions can teach students about ideas concerning race and gender.

Judge Britt C. Grant previously ruled that by “limiting its restrictions to a list of ideas designated as offensive, the Act targets speech based on its content,” and that by “barring only speech that endorses any of those ideas, it penalizes certain viewpoints – the greatest First Amendment sin.”

In last week’s appellate ruling, Judge Grant doubled down, calling the law “a breathtaking assertion of power to ban unpopular ideas from public discourse.”

Viewpoint judgments will always provide slippery standards for would-be speech police. Viewpoints cannot be effectively controlled or legitimately adjudicated by law, or by official pressure campaigns and jawboning.

Protect The 1st has long been critical of the ideological monoculture on many U.S. campuses. The proper response to one-sided academic ideology, however, is not to pass laws that attempt to dictate countervailing ideology. Such efforts are doomed to fail, and not just in court. Attempting to legislate or regulate the inherently slippery nature of speech is a fool’s errand.
​
The best approaches must be cultural. It is perfectly legitimate for legislators and donors to pressure universities to open discussion to all sides by declaring their institutions neutral forums – the very kind of spaces that should flourish under the First Amendment.

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    2025 Year In Review
    Academic Freedom
    Amicus Briefs
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence
    Book Banning
    Campus Speech
    Censorship
    Congress
    Court Hearings
    Donor Privacy
    Due Process
    Executive Power
    First Amendment
    First Amendment Online
    Freedom Of Press
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Government Ownership
    Government Transparency
    In The Media
    Journalism
    Law Enforcement
    Legal
    Legislation
    Legislative Agenda
    Letters To Congress
    Motions
    News
    Online Speech
    Opinion
    Parental Rights
    PRESS Act
    PT1 Amicus Briefs
    Save Oak Flat
    School Choice
    SCOTUS
    Section 230
    Speaking Of The First Amendment
    Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

we  the  people.

LET  YOUR  VOICE  BE  HEARD:


ABOUT

Who We Are

​Leadership

ISSUES

1st Amendment

TAKE ACTION

Donate

​Contact Us
® Copyright 2026 Protect The 1st Foundation